DEATH OF A REPOMAN -
A CHAPTER IN THE DECLINE (and Fall?) OF
THE AMERICAN EMPIRE! (Abridged Version)

CHAPTER 1 - JUST THE FACTS PLEASE

EXHIBIT 1 - BUYER IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS
EXHIBIT 2 - FAYHE DEPO SNIPPET
EXHIBIT 3 - FNA COLLECTION SHEET
DO NOT MAIL
OTHER LINKS TO WELLS FARGO INJUSTICE
TABLE OF CONTENTS

TO THE POINT : WHAT FOLLOWS ARE THE SIMPLE,
INDISPUTABLE FACTS OF A SINGLE INSTANCE OF U.S.A.
CORPORATE, GOVERNMENTAL, JUDICIAL CORRUPTION.

EXHIBIT 1 - BUYER IN THE
ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS

LET US START BY CITING THE FIRST PIECE OF EVIDENCE
THAT DOES NOT RELY UPON THE AUTHOR'S ASSERTIONS:

MINNESOTA STATUTE (UCC) 336.9-320 : (a)Buyer in the
ordinary course of business. Except as otherwise provided
in subsection (e), a buyer in ordinary course of business, other
than a person buying farm products from a person engaged in
farming operations, takes free of a security interest created by
the buyer's seller, even if the security interest is perfected and
the buyer knows of its existence.

The author Don Mashak asserts to you that this means that if you
go into a car dealership and, in good faith,buy a vehicle you are
protected from any liens others may have on the vehicle.
If the dealer owes the bank money as part of a Floor Plan, or
the car was there on consignment, the purchaser is entitled to
clear title regardless. As long as the bank or consignor knows
that the dealer has the vehicle and authorized the dealer to
resell the vehicle the purchaser is protected. (Please do not
rely upon the author Don Mashak's interpretation, ask your own
attorney if the interpretation is correct.)

1st National Bank of Anoka, NA (hereafter "FNA" repossessed
vehicles resold to new buyers by the Car Dealer and refinanced
by other banks saying they did not know the car dealer had
repossessed the vehicles and they were unaware the Car Dealer
resold the vehicles. The authur of this document repossessed
99% of the FNA vehicles. The Author tried communicating the
facts at the time these matters were ripe for litigation and was
greeted with threats to destroy his business, his reputation and
was finally given a death threat. The author Don Mashak
communicated these matters to local, State and Federal authorities
including a US Senator and the FBI(Federal Bureau of Investigation).

That having been said, The Author submits to you the following
documents. The Author asks you decide if 1st National Bank of
Anoka(FNA) was fully aware of the vehicles the author Don Mashak
repossessed as an employee of the car dealer and which the car
dealer then resold.

EXHIBIT 2 - FAYHE DEPO SNIPPET

FNA Tom Fayhe Deposition - I knew & my Boss Ruth Gruessing Knew!

The above document is a portion of the deposition of Tom Fayhe, a loan
officer employed by FNA. In this portion of his sworn deposition, Tom
Fayhe truthfully admits that FNA knew that the author Don Mashak of
this document was collecting on and repossessing vehicles for this FNA
bank, even though the author Don Mashak was an employee of the Car
Dealer Nord Motors. If we were allowed access to the depositions of other
FNA employees such as Ruth Gruessing, Bruce Dilley, Roger Okerman
and Mark Faydo etc. wewould find further confirmation of this
repossession and resale relationship. So impressed was FNA bank with
the author Don Mashak's collection and repossession abilities that then
FNA Vice President Roger Okerman on first meeting the Author said, "Your
Reputation Precedes You!" This document is in various court case records
that will be provided later on this website.

EXHIBIT 3 - FNA COLLECTION SHEET

The above document is a copy of an actual 1st National Bank of Anoka,
NA (FNA) Collection sheet. Before the days of the internet and cheap
computer storage, collections were done from sheets like the one above.
The first thing for you to wonder is how did the author Don Mashak's,
who was never an employee of 1st National Bank of Anoka, NA, come to
be in possession of this document. The author Don Mashak informs
you that he went to FNA once per week and had a meeting with either
Tom Fahey and/or Bruce Dilley and others. Each day the author
Don Mashak called FNA to find out who paid and therefore did not have
to be called anymore. A line was drawn through each account that the
author Don Mashak was informed, "paid" At each weekly
meeting the author Don Mashak recieved an updated printout and
the author Don Mashak would indicate to the FNA representative which
vehicles he thought should be repossessed. The FNA representative
would usually confirm but sometimes decline the recommendation. The
author acted accordingly. The handwriting on this particular document
is Don Mashak's.

DO NOT MAIL

If the reader is still is not convinced that FNA knew that vehicles were
being repossessed by Don Mashak, your attention is directed to the last
account on the page. (Amy ....) You will note that the address is changed
to "DO NOT MAIL". Instead of following standard bank accounting
practices of charging of repossessed accounts and moving them to
"Non-Performing Assets", FNA left the account open and instructed the
Car Dealer to make the monthly payments on each account. This is a
Non-Standard Accounting practice. (Ask your Accountant) This is a
Non-Compliant Banking Practice. (Ask your local State or Federal Bank
Examiner)

FNA did this to avoid the Federal Bank Examiners discovering the higher
losses in this portfolio and earmarking the file as requiring additional loss
reserves for future losses. The requirement of additional loss reserves
would have an adverse affect on FNA's Financial Rating, decrease
profitability, lead to cash flow problems and possibly require the owners
to pay in additional Cash for Capital Reserves back into the bank.

"DO NOT MAIL" is also significant because it was done to prevent
discovery of the conspiracy. NOT following standard accounting
practices caused the FNA Computer system TO "accidently" send
"Courtesy Late Notices" to debtors whose vehicles had already been
repossessed when the Dealer NMC missed making a payment on
that particular account. Debtors would call the bank and ask
approximately, "Why am I getting this courtesy notice, you already
repossessed my car." The fix was to replace the addresses with
"DO NOT MAIL" but that very act to prevent discovery of the
conspiracy, confirms to all that FNA employees knew that the author
was repossessing vehicles.

FNA has already admitted in court records that only FNA employees
had access to the FNA Computer System. Ergo, since only FNA
employees could alter data on FNA's computer system and since the
"DO NOT MAIL" accounts almost identically matched accounts that
were repossessed and the accounts the car dealer was making payments
on, FNA knew that the vehicles had been repossessed and held at the
car dealership for resale. While it is enough that the documents
thusfar presented show that a few FNA employees knew of the
authors collection and repossession activities, the Author adamantly
declares to the reader that knowledge of his collection and
repossession activities were well and widely known from loan
officers to upper management of FNA.

Need another reason why "DO NOT MAIL" matters ? As a defense
to litigation that followed, FNA insisted it had no knowledge of the
Author's collection and repossession activities. Unfortunately for
FNA, the Author did not have to rely upon his own word as proof of
FNA's Knowledge; The previous document speaks for itself. Hence
the witness tampering through threats that escalated to death threats.
Without these documents, it is likely the author would have been
wrongfully convicted of a crime. Instead, in later civil litigation brought
by the author, the author was coerced into settling for $15000.00.
(More on that later)

As an exercize, please try to put yourself in the author's shoes.
as an analogy, imagine your your personal reaction and emotions if a
couple of years after you quit your last job, they denied you ever
worked there and everything you did was therefore unauthorized.
Amidst your shock, You feel confident that the allegation are
ridiculous. As you go down the list of how you can prove you worked
there, you start looking for unbiased and incontrovertable evidence
of the relationship. "How are they going to deny the papers you
wrote, documents you signed, wedding receptions, birthday
parties and other social gatherings you went to your coworkers with?
Comfortable with your defense, you relax.... but they keep
asserting that you never worked there. And they want to
prosecute you for it. The author asserts to you that if he had not
kept the collection papers he would wrongfully have been put in
jail on the allegation that he repossessed the vehicles without
the knowledge of FNA.

Imagine the authors reaction to something as ridiculous as FNA
denying knowledge of his collection and repossession activies
slowing changing to panic as the noose tightened and the
possibilities of dire consequences falling upon you went from
ridiculous to probable. Imagine facing the entire wealth, might
and power of Wells Fargo Bank, NA, formerly Norwest Bank, NA
focused upon you simply for being in the wrong place at the
wrong time.

About halfway through the next chapter comes what
the average reader will call the "Good Part". The
Reader's "Good Part", the Author knows as the stress
and torments that have lead to his declining health
and eventual premature death whether from health
complications or a sudden case of instant
"lead poisoning" from the now exposed conspirators.

"When bad men combine, the good must associate;
else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice
in a contemptible struggle" Edmond Burke 1770 -
better known now as, "All that is Necessary for the
Triumph of Evil is for Good People to do Nothing!"

EXHIBIT 1 - BUYER IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS

EXHIBIT 2 - FAYHE DEPO SNIPPET

EXHIBIT 3 - FNA COLLECTION SHEET

DO NOT MAIL

OTHER LINKS TO WELLS FARGO INJUSTICE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXHIBIT 1 - BUYER IN THE
ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS